The Challenger Selling Method - Why I'm Not a Huge Fan

The Challenger Selling Method is widely known, but it isn’t effective in most sales situations for today's modern buyer. Here are a few reasons why I am not a fan, and if you watch the video above, I dive into a few of those in more detail: 

1. Can Be Too Aggressive for Some Buyers – The Challenger approach involves pushing back on customer assumptions and "re-educating" them. It usually comes across as confrontational or arrogant, especially with buyers who prefer a more consultative or relationship-driven sales process, which is most people these days. 

2. Not Ideal for Relationship-Based Sales – Some industries and deals require deep trust and long-term relationship building. The Challenger method focuses on disrupting a customer’s thinking rather than fostering relationships, which I just don't agree with at all. ANY sales situation will benefit from building the right relationships and selling in the right way.

3. Difficult for New or Less Experienced Sales Reps – The method requires deep industry knowledge, confidence, and the ability to challenge a prospect’s current thinking persuasively. At the very least, to be effective with this model you need to be an expert. And even then, the model is still broken since your view is clouded by your agenda to push back. Less experienced reps may struggle to execute this effectively, leading to lost opportunities.

4. May Not Work Well with Highly Knowledgeable Buyers – In industries where buyers are already well-educated on their challenges and solutions (e.g., enterprise IT, healthcare, or finance), trying to "challenge" them may backfire and be seen as unnecessary or even insulting. Most buyers will come to the conversation already more than halfway through their buying process. Pushing back on them isn't the right approach. 

5. Requires a Strong Organizational Strategy – Challenger selling is most effective when supported by marketing, sales enablement, and leadership. Without strong company-wide alignment, individual sales reps may find it difficult to create compelling insights that truly challenge their buyers. I teach alignment of teams and departments and the Challenger Method has always provided the most hardships when companies have been using that and looking for a change. 

6. Not as Effective for Transactional Sales – If a product is highly commoditized or transactional, the Challenger approach may be overkill. In these cases, speed, efficiency, and value-based selling often work better and knowing how to pivot and change your selling approach based on the scenario is something you need to know. 

7. Can Lengthen the Sales Cycle – Because the method involves reshaping a prospect’s thinking, it can extend the time it takes to close a deal. In fast-moving sales environments, this may be a disadvantage compared to a more direct selling approach.

If you're looking for more sales tips, tricks, and info, make sure you join the newsletter and get it free every Monday morning.